Ref. Kenny Padi suspended for rest of the time for granting Kotoko wrong punishment against Hearts
Official Joseph Kenny Padi has been suspended until the end of the association season after the Match Review Panel of the Ghana Football Association's choice that the ref blundered in granting the punishment to Asante Kotoko in their Ghana Premier League Matchweek 24 game against Hearts of Oak.
In different choices of the Panel, Referee Misbaw Mohammed and Assistant Kenneth
Tweneboah-Kodua have been suspended until the end of the time for failing in the choice to grant a punishment to Medeama SC in their match against King Faisal FC.
The following are choices declared by the Match survey board:
ASANTE KOTOKO VS. HEARTS OF OAK (MATCH DAY 24)
Synopsis OF COMPLAINT
In the 14 moment of play, Referee Kenny Padi granted a questionable punishment to Asante Kotoko when Hearts of Oak player, Nurudeen Abdul-Aziz won a 50 ball in their 18-yard box from Fabio Gama (No. 10) of Asante Kotoko.
Officials Response
The official demanded that the Hearts player stepped on the foot of the Kotoko player which he later concurred that there was no venturing of foot subsequent to watching the video. He then, at that point, guarded that there was a back and forth at a point, which the video plainly showed that it was not the situation.
Perceptions, FINDINGS AND GROUNDS OF THE DECISION
Per the video watched comparable to the 14 minutes episode, player number 24 of Hearts of Oak tested player number 10 of Asante Kotoko decently.
There was no foul submitted which justified any punishment. The hand on the rear of the aggressor no affected the assailant.
All the more so the assailant shouldn't have flopping in reverse assuming the fall was a direct result of the hand of the protector, clearly it was anything but a push so falling in reverse recommend a planned endeavor to counterfeit a foul.
We additionally viewed as certain variables:
Assuming there was moving as asserted by the arbitrator, we saw no development of the arm from the back to advance. Meaning no HAND MOVEMENT Neither pulling development from front to back.
The aggressor was at that point hurling himself down in a totally bizarre manner.
On the off chance that there was pulling or moving as guaranteed by the official, the aggressor ought to have fallen on the face and not with his back as found in the video. (FOOTBALL UNDERSTANDING)
The video likewise showed a lot of irregularities in his choices during his directing of the match particularly after the punishment episode. The ref lost focus.
DECISION(S)
That's what the Panel reasoned, per the video watched, and the official's safeguard is conversely.
Per the video watched the Panel maintains the viewpoint that the arbitrator blundered in granting the punishment. This blunder changed the result of the match
blogpay
Total Comments: 0