In a dramatic turn of events at a polling station in the Ablekuma West Constituency, voters have rejected food packs that were allegedly sent by the Member of Parliament, Ursula Owusu-Ekuful. The food, which was intended for party officials at the polling center, sparked protests and led to the vehicle carrying the packages being driven away by the angry crowd. This incident has raised serious concerns about the influence of food and other gifts in the election process, and the integrity of the electoral system in Ghana.
The situation unfolded when a pick-up truck filled with food packs arrived at the polling station. According to those in the vehicle, the food was meant for party officials working at the polling station, but the crowd interpreted it as an attempt to influence the outcome of the election. The voters, visibly upset by the presence of the food, began shouting and hooting at the driver, forcing him to leave the area under intense pressure. The incident, which was captured on video, quickly went viral on social media, where it sparked a mix of reactions from the public.
In the viral footage, you can hear the protesters chanting, "We don’t want it!" as the pick-up truck is driven away, while election officials and security personnel look on. The video quickly gained traction online, and many people started debating whether the actions of the voters were justified or if they were overreacting. Some praised the voters for rejecting what they saw as an unethical attempt to sway the election in favor of the incumbent MP, while others felt that the situation could have been handled more calmly.
This incident in Ablekuma West comes shortly after another similar event in the Ayawaso West Wuogon Constituency. There, MP Lydia Seyram Alhassan was accused of distributing bags of food and water to individuals standing in the voting queue. Alhassan denied these allegations, explaining that the food was intended for her campaign team, Electoral Commission agents, and journalists who were present at the polling station. According to Alhassan, her women’s organizer had given food to some people in the queue out of goodwill after they asked for it, but she herself did not distribute any packages directly.
Despite Alhassan’s explanation, the incident in Ayawaso West Wuogon raised questions about the ethics of food distribution during the election period. Similar concerns were also voiced after the Ablekuma West incident, with many wondering whether such practices were being used to influence voters’ decisions. The presence of food and other gifts at polling stations is seen by some as an attempt to sway the outcome of the election by appealing to voters' immediate needs, rather than focusing on the candidates' policies and qualifications.
The controversy has also caught the attention of the Commission of Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ). Dr. Joseph Whittal, the Commissioner of CHRAJ, spoke about another viral video showing security personnel receiving food while standing in a voting queue during the special voting exercise. Dr. Whittal expressed his concern, saying that security officers should be more mindful of their actions during the election process, as their behavior could undermine the integrity of the electoral system. He also emphasized that such actions could embarrass the security forces and damage public trust in the election process.
While these incidents have raised important questions about the ethics of distributing food and other gifts during elections, they also highlight the importance of maintaining a free and fair electoral process. The ability of voters to make independent choices without undue influence is one of the cornerstones of democracy. In this case, the voters in Ablekuma West made their voices heard by rejecting the food packs, sending a strong message that they did not want to be swayed by gifts or material incentives.
At the same time, the situation also points to the need for more effective monitoring and regulation of campaign practices during election periods. The Electoral Commission and other authorities must ensure that all political parties and candidates adhere to ethical standards and that no one uses gifts, food, or other forms of inducement to influence voters. This will help to preserve the integrity of the election process and ensure that the will of the people is accurately reflected in the results.
In conclusion, the rejection of food packs in Ablekuma West by voters has sparked a wider debate about the role of gifts and material incentives in elections. While some see it as a justified response to an unethical attempt to influence the vote, others argue that it could have been handled more calmly. What is clear, however, is that these incidents have raised important questions about the fairness and transparency of the election process in Ghana, and how best to protect the integrity of future elections. As the December 7 elections approach, it is crucial that all parties and candidates respect the principles of democracy and ensure that voters are free to make their choices without undue influence.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0